How To Use Cheats On Gpsphone No Computer

the First Congress Mexico Anarchist

Jurassic Park: The possible revival of especifismo

-

Chronicles of agreements and disagreements from a (first) Anarchist Congress in Mexico

He was buried, but overnight funeral, from the lighted windows, his books, arranged three by three, kept watch like angels with outspread wings and resembled, for which no longer existed, the symbol his resurrection.

Marcel Proust

Beyond Death live (...) and from otherworldly spirits dominate our lives and choose our destiny (...) are the ghosts who dwell among us (...)

Allan Kardec

Aclarémoslo hard and from the beginning to avoid any misunderstanding: here, we do not intend to disqualify the organizational efforts of the First Congress called Anarchist Mexico or attacking its organizers, not try to ignore the real motivations and objectives that gave rise to such an event, let alone trying to obstruct the journey that starts from port so hazy. Plain and simple you want to put our thoughts in the space of debate unavoidable.

is no doubt that the old Marx attended at that precise reason that made Hegel, claiming that: when history repeats itself, transformed into something that was tragic comedy ever. However, now that we bring this meditation Marx, we would not be entirely fair if no record that not everyone sl @ s participants in the Congress bet to repeat, much less, opting for comedy. The presence of a myriad of young comrades s, but determined hart @ s @ s, note above, in clear opposition to the vision regressionist-conscious or not, the feeling nostalgic and vocation spiritualist who emerged from the environment.

Clearly it is time to discuss some key concepts of "organized anarchy" is probably the main one, because it emanates from the complicated branching before us with their specific labels within the specific. For those who know from within the long road of distortion of the period of anarchist ideology, it is inevitable to encounter many points of contact with what is happening today. That's why all this fashion on the "organized anarchy," either "short" or "specified" - is not perceived as a theoretical operation of original development but as a political rapprochement with sectors of anarchism "official" and "anti-capitalism" diffuse. It was no coincidence the presence of representatives of another symbol, like the well-known actors star cast of fictitious organizations.

However, there are two differences from what happened half a century ago. There would be a first difference today has more negative traits is that this debacle was just a proper motion of withdrawal and then re-articulation of anarchism the defeat of the English anarcho-syndicalism and, interestingly, unable to exercise any irradiation, whereas today we are facing a phenomenon seen in

Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, etc. -Highlights for pompous and ridiculous, a couple of recent trials: Resurrection of the FACA (Federation of Anarchist Communist Argentina) and the intergalactic rave OPAR in collusion with a samba school protoleninista "But the second difference and has features to take so more optimistic since the intention is simply to caricature: there is really no noticeable weight-with-that "organized anarchy" which refer only thing that is perceived in this field is a sad imitation, schematic and pamphleteer who do not know where to go and therefore, ventures to comedy. The saddest thing is that this, or comedy comes, is a soap opera of bad taste and without a hearing, which is made by way of script away from the concrete reality in the context of the most fervent tradition taranovelas

of Televisa. Of course, as always happens in the realm of fiction, and begin to spin the story the next chapter. It is not accidental installation of rustic, makeshift operating room or the bizarre structures pending the Renaissance ray to take a walk to the corpse. Ergo: the resurrection of the FAM (Anarchist Federation of Mexico). We can not say we're disappointed, it would imply a certain expectation. But if we confess to a deep pain. In the depths. Long time ago had left the congresitis chronic, reunionitis congenital long old forward decided to run away where we do not reach the foul smell of ideology, where the number does not compromise the proposal, which does not impose anarchism, where he lived Anarchy . Therefore, we caused a great regret to see comrades s using the same practices wretches who both have criticized in the past, reaching for the misrepresentation, the induction of handling, to accommodate the rapporteurs and proposals to a previously prepared script. There was no alternative: if we find that the rudder was attached we jump into the water. Just before the meeting opened, and we had to listen to a prerecorded dance but supposedly made out of our line, we retired. Otherwise there was no choice but to turn again into discordant note, the deafening shot at the concert. We prefer to exit. Otherwise it would have further exacerbated the mood and no, it's worth continuing to contribute to the black legend. Definitely, it was so strong that showed up invoking the spirits. Only with this flood of souls was impossible to control to review "trends" and avoid conflicting agendas clearly. It was time for the dead. Suddenly we heard the echo of a cane and his voice trembling with Fidel Miró ordering and start raising the anchor, once again, travel in a circle: the eternal and tortuous journey to nowhere.

Gustavo Rodríguez .

Mexico, May 4, 2011.

A text was sent and that Congress would not spread!!

Greetings to Prime Anarchist Congress of Mexico. We introduce ourselves as individuals, to share the concerns that we explain below, we have realized that they are shared by comrades elsewhere, implicadxs, like in the fight nosotrxs public or open and in the underground or insurrection, being for this reason we prefer to communicate in writing to protect anonymity, not cowardice, but on its own security.

then we'd like the text would read in full within (and not at the end) of the section considered most appropriate at the meeting on Saturday 30 April. Thus its brevity.

A fraternal greeting

We introduce ourselves as individuals from around the country implicadxs in various anarchist collectives and affinity groups and initiatives that insurrectionary anarchists, to preserve anonymity and security, we approach writing a perception that we are looking long and suffering to ourselves in both types of struggle.

Over time it is showing a split between these two types of struggle anarchist, I could hear some of the self to non-insurrectionary insurrectionary who are reformists, anarchists games, strawberries, bourgeois, wealthy , populist, that their struggle (public events, publications, lectures, ...) are not really fighting. Meanwhile, the self- dry anarchist insurrectionary delete those violent, immature, cowardly, out of ideas produced, thus justifying the repression of the state (always present, whether there are actions insurrection or not) and subordinating them to self-censorship by not being able to argue for retain anonymity.

sometimes has fallen into serious contradiction to argue that vegan insurrectxs have come to "shit our anarchist movement." What movement? Movement "who? Who holds the patent of anarchism in Mexico? nosotrxs to

In turn we believe that the criticism is valid and necessary for the struggle forward in an objective sense, but among the critics and the criminalization, marginalization or the marking is a huge difference.

as is envisaged in both, an authoritarian attitude of ideological vanguard capable of judging, even publicly, what and who they are or not anarchists, an appropriation of the movement, become subject to property and claims by their autorxs and the objective of strengthening an acronym, an image, an ego, a subtle requirement to position yourself to me or vegan otrxs, reducing everything to 2 choices that seem to impose on the imaginary collective marginalization and direct and indirect contempt toward those who are the "other side."

As a consequence we see that it corrupts the fight in divisions and absurd confrontations, constant gossip on the Internet and word of mouth, hypocrisy and false solidarity between comrades, many groups of different name but formed by the same people , which are usually a very small group or even individuals, a sense of competition both between groups and between action groups, publications and claims of great arrogance, the prevalence of personal problems over actions, self-centeredness, the emergence of avant-garde libertarian think they have the truth ... That is, weakening of an anarchist movement that seems to be more static and fight more fictional than real, thus hindering its effectiveness.

As an alternative, we propose to end the irrational position, consider the insurrection and the public as part of a whole, as has always been (is not it hypocritical to idolize Magon, Zapata and Guerrero Praxedis and then criminalize insurrectionary today? is not it hypocritical to criticize the demonstrations, rallies, lectures and workshops through which we know and we entered into the fight?) recognize the various trenches, which need to be in contact, coordinated, see the "other" as a "we" composed as comrades, not as internal enemies, stop walking arbitrarily accusing anyone infiltradxs and police that has a strong speech, get publications and material that are not strictly unique social insurrectional but their input mix and can see both inputs together, be aware of the common bond and their significance to the fraternity something experiential and Constructive beyond a mere theoretical concept.

And if that does not convince us or believe to be the other side who should take the first step, we may have to discuss directly and without hypocrisy and warned that unxs comrades, are we or are we not comrades comrades? Are we against the state or not we? Against the power and construction-destruction should not be mediation. Should the public fight, social and open and clandestine direct action insurrectionist and go their separate ways and independent? Nosotrxs, of course, do not believe it.

Some individu @ s @ s @ s insurrectionary revolutionary anarchists.