Daniel Mancuso
Mauricio Macri quiere que se cumpla la ley, Nelson Castro quiere que se cumpla la ley, Eduardo Duhalde quiere que se cumpla la ley... Todos los que no cumplen la ley o trabajan para los que no la cumplen, dicen que hay que cumplir con la ley.
Dicen una cosa y hacen lo contrario.
Clarin, Ernestina, Magnetto, no cumplen la ley.
La jueza federal de San Isidro Sandra Arroyo Salgado hizo lugar al pedido de Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo morning and cited for Marcela and Noble Felipe Herrera to extract a new sample of blood, saliva or hair, and determine whether they are children of the disappeared.
With this decision, the judge rejected the submission made by the Attorney Rita Molina, who had requested that the existing samples, taken in December 2009, compared with Bank file National Genetic Data.
Salgado Arroyo dismissed these samples, extracted by the Forensic section by order of judge Conrado Bergesio , but in his ruling called the heirs of Ernestina Herrera de Noble tomorrow at 9 in the Bank, which operates in the Durand Hospital. There he held "direct extraction, with or without consent, minimal blood, saliva, skin, hair or other biological samples as belonging undoubted and Philip Noble Marcela Herrera" , the ruling said.
Belén Rodríguez Cardozo, director of the National Genetic Data Bank (BNDG), who will be responsible for taking the samples, and also "your selection, acquisition, preservation and custody," the ruling. It also states that they should be asking young people individually if they have reconsidered its position regarding the delivery of biological samples in a free, voluntary and informed.
The complainant lawyer Alcira Ríos, had already called for compulsory removal in September this year. "The judge had no choice, because according to law samples are taken only in the National Genetic Data Bank ... Other causes have been to 3 or four times this evidence, therefore, to use existing samples set a bad precedent that we would not allow. "
Rivers and Paul Llonto representing families shroud García and Miranda Lanoscou .
The federal fiscal Rita Molina lamented that miss "a very valuable test, the main we have so far" , referring to the archived taken by Conrado Bergesio . "I want to know the truth, but this decision may cause a delay because the background that exist in the 8 years of schooling is very difficult to voluntarily submit to the extraction" .
How so? Will they escape? Will they ignore the law as the Act makes Clarin Media?
"You need to know the truth now, because it can extinguish the action" , added Rita Molina, in relation to the advanced age of Ernestina Herrera de Noble, owner of Clarín.
strategy the defense of the widow of Noble and Noble brothers representation of Herrera would file an action for unconstitutional law that allows the extraction compulsive (Article 218 bis of the Penal Code) and thus stay the judge's ruling.
Judge Sandra Arroyo Salgado and advanced its position on the subject in the same fault: "In my view the procedure under Article 218 bis is not only constitutional, but which is a reasonable tool under the principle of proportionality, providing an integrated solution of various interests at stake " .
This is an important issue from the past and it affects the present and the future of all Argentines: Does second-class citizens who are prisoners, and first-class citizens who commit crimes and go unpunished, again and again?
We are one step away from discovering the truth (or eat another frog corporate).
If the draw-off is not done, if Felipe and Marcela are hidden as the Mercedes Benz trout Susana Gimenez, if the strong do what they want, whether by legal obstacles and chicanes, the Grupo Clarin holds injustice to hide the identity of "Brothers?, and judicial complicity corporate impunity continues to hold, then we will find a huge wound that civil-military dictatorship left us an alien creature that grows inside our country and threatens to destroy the living and building a truly democratic society.
Dicen una cosa y hacen lo contrario.
Clarin, Ernestina, Magnetto, no cumplen la ley.
La jueza federal de San Isidro Sandra Arroyo Salgado hizo lugar al pedido de Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo morning and cited for Marcela and Noble Felipe Herrera to extract a new sample of blood, saliva or hair, and determine whether they are children of the disappeared.
With this decision, the judge rejected the submission made by the Attorney Rita Molina, who had requested that the existing samples, taken in December 2009, compared with Bank file National Genetic Data.
Salgado Arroyo dismissed these samples, extracted by the Forensic section by order of judge Conrado Bergesio , but in his ruling called the heirs of Ernestina Herrera de Noble tomorrow at 9 in the Bank, which operates in the Durand Hospital. There he held "direct extraction, with or without consent, minimal blood, saliva, skin, hair or other biological samples as belonging undoubted and Philip Noble Marcela Herrera" , the ruling said.
Belén Rodríguez Cardozo, director of the National Genetic Data Bank (BNDG), who will be responsible for taking the samples, and also "your selection, acquisition, preservation and custody," the ruling. It also states that they should be asking young people individually if they have reconsidered its position regarding the delivery of biological samples in a free, voluntary and informed.
- The judge said that Marcela and Felipe should be submitted "under penalty", as provided by Article 154 of Criminal Procedure Code, which indicates that given special citations "witnesses, experts, interpreters and custodians will be conducted by law enforcement in the absence of good cause. "
The complainant lawyer Alcira Ríos, had already called for compulsory removal in September this year. "The judge had no choice, because according to law samples are taken only in the National Genetic Data Bank ... Other causes have been to 3 or four times this evidence, therefore, to use existing samples set a bad precedent that we would not allow. "
Rivers and Paul Llonto representing families shroud García and Miranda Lanoscou .
The federal fiscal Rita Molina lamented that miss "a very valuable test, the main we have so far" , referring to the archived taken by Conrado Bergesio . "I want to know the truth, but this decision may cause a delay because the background that exist in the 8 years of schooling is very difficult to voluntarily submit to the extraction" .
How so? Will they escape? Will they ignore the law as the Act makes Clarin Media?
"You need to know the truth now, because it can extinguish the action" , added Rita Molina, in relation to the advanced age of Ernestina Herrera de Noble, owner of Clarín.
strategy the defense of the widow of Noble and Noble brothers representation of Herrera would file an action for unconstitutional law that allows the extraction compulsive (Article 218 bis of the Penal Code) and thus stay the judge's ruling.
Judge Sandra Arroyo Salgado and advanced its position on the subject in the same fault: "In my view the procedure under Article 218 bis is not only constitutional, but which is a reasonable tool under the principle of proportionality, providing an integrated solution of various interests at stake " .
This is an important issue from the past and it affects the present and the future of all Argentines: Does second-class citizens who are prisoners, and first-class citizens who commit crimes and go unpunished, again and again?
We are one step away from discovering the truth (or eat another frog corporate).
If the draw-off is not done, if Felipe and Marcela are hidden as the Mercedes Benz trout Susana Gimenez, if the strong do what they want, whether by legal obstacles and chicanes, the Grupo Clarin holds injustice to hide the identity of "Brothers?, and judicial complicity corporate impunity continues to hold, then we will find a huge wound that civil-military dictatorship left us an alien creature that grows inside our country and threatens to destroy the living and building a truly democratic society.
0 comments:
Post a Comment