The jury and the verdicts of the Journal News
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Congratulation Letter For Pregnancy
In the last issue, December 24, the magazine conducted its usual profile editorial coverage of the best and worst in different fields. Find out.
Hugo Presman (Registered Journal)
News magazine titles is characterized by loud and profusion cover page. Surely their nothingness inversely proportional to its size, is the reason why, up to hook and display the note, has lost its way all the dynamite and just contains a dose of CeBIT miserable for poor older and fireworks for the youngest.
is a sneaky way of doing journalism, which defines the editorial profile as "pure journalism" without the ever-youthful rapture modesty of the veteran Jorge Fontevecchia cheeks.
In the last issue, December 24, made his usual coverage of the best and worst in different fields.
The so-called jury was composed in the last two years by Jorge Lanata, Margarita Stolbizer, Francisco de Narvaez, Joaquin Morales Sola, Victoria Donda, Magdalena Ruiz Guinazu, Fernando Braga Menéndez, Artemio López, Beatriz Sarlo, Marcos Aguinis, Graciela Romer Julio Barbaro, and Alfredo Leuco. They were joined in 2009: Elisa Carrio, Sergio Bergman, Alberto Cormillot, Juan Becerra, Nik, Julio Cobos, Gerardo Morales, Nina Pelozo, Nelson Castro, Mario Das Neves, Juan Ignacio de Mendiguren, John Carr, Mary O `Donnell Sergio Berensztein and Ricardo Rouvier. The latter were replaced in 2010 by Luis Majul, Paula Bertol, Ernesto Sanz, Pino Solanas, Sergio Massa, Rafael Bielsa, Graciela Ocaña, Roberto Pettinato, Luis D'Elias, Martin Sabbatella, Omar Bello, Daniel Sabsay, Guillermo Marco, Santiago Kovadloff and Daniel Hadad.
short: the jury as the spokesmen of pure journalism consists of 28 members, of which 13 was composed in the last two years. But the first alleged lie of pure journalism is that there is no jury in the sense that all its members meet and deliberate, and each in the presence of the other gives the reasons for their vote. It is a survey of 28 people by phone or email which is then tabulated the results of which no one is to verify. Call jury to a survey carried out so small, and without technical rules of statistics, is so misleading, false and biased as usual weekly titles. And all this is wrapped as pure journalism. The Editorial Perfil do one of his usual tricks is not surprising. What it is striking that many respectable people de la vida política e intelectual argentina se presten a este ardid para legitimar lo que ya está señalado desde antes del pretendido veredicto. Y que algunas de esas personas dignas concurran por segunda vez a que se los señale falsamente como jurados, cuando apenas han respondido a una encuesta, es una ingenuidad en la visión más permisiva y una lamentable complicidad en la mentira en la instancia menos favorable. Y cuyos resultados implican un intento de descalificación de personas en forma arbitraria.
Veamos cómo se expidió “el jurado” en los dos últimos años. El mejor político en el 2009 y 2010 fue el radical Ernesto Sanz. El peor fue Guillermo Moreno en el 2009 y en el año que concluye Elisa Carrio. The officer was Graciela Ocaña best last year and Nilda Garre in today. In the area journalists, the worst in the two years considered Orlando Barone was accompanied in 2010 by Victor Hugo Morales. The best was Joaquin Morales Sola in 2009 and Alfredo Leuco in 2010.
The striking that the newspaper company does not disclose what the parameters for nominations. This year on page 7 opens a precarious flimsy umbrella explanations under the heading "Voting controversy" in two of its paragraphs reads: "And the worst period forecast item disputes. This year Victor share this rating Hugo Morales and Orlando Barone, who had been elected in 2009. At that time, the panelist blasted 6,7,8 magazine. So it must be remembered that, as has been done for fifteen years, who chooses a jury of renowned personalities who, in secret, vote line by line. The result appears to count every vote ... .... This time the election of Victor Hugo as the worst period was also a surprise to this editor. It was from here that I ran for the Profile Award for Freedom of Expression 2009, he shared with Joaquin Morales Sola. This was done on the understanding that both, from their known paths personal, reflected two opposing positions and honest about the Media Law. We believe that the results of the 2010 Survey are crossed by the extreme polarization that led Kirchner. And to those who voted did not think Barone paths and Morales, but both took positions in relation to the government. "
Lost in flagrant contradictions, confused biased magazine survey (mentioned only once) with a jury. Even in the fall of the note reads: "A panel convened by NEWS chooses the winners and losers of the year" It is clear
confession, that professional values \u200b\u200bare not judged but positions politicians. This is an exercise in McCarthyism involved in the logo of pure journalism. It is worth pointing poignant and ironic writing, many of the original approaches Orlando Barone. In January, a group of journalists, outraged by the injustice that was perpetrated wantonly against the journalist and writer, published a declaration on page 12 under the title "In Defense of Orlando Barone."
Victor Hugo is the best English football reporter for the past five decades. Possessing a polished and precise language, a rare amenity, has entered with signal success in radio programs, radio news general interest, such as "The Radio" and "La Mañana", among others. What is being punished in the Uruguayan journalist, is its support for media law and multimedia historical confrontation with Clarin, which placed it on the same path that the government and its defense in general. It would be interesting to imagine if, when this is aligned with management of the field and when his opposition to the government
led him at first suspicious and look critically at the media law, voters in the poll would have nomination News worst journalist. Even if it means making a counterfactual history, it is easy to say no.
"Coincidentally" always the best traditional journalists are spokespersons establishment or some recent upstarts. In 1995, 1996 and 1997 he was elected Mariano Grondona, in this last year I shared with Morales Solá. In 1998 he was elected Magdalena Ruiz Guinazu. In 1999, Nelson Castro. From 2000 to 2006 he was elected Joaquín Morales Solá, which he shared with Nelson Castro in 2002 and 2005. In 2007 he won Jorge Lanata. In 2008 and 2009 again Morales Solá.
Finally, two final considerations regarding the selected items as best in journalism and politics: do not judge in this note the good qualities of fellow professionals Alfredo Leuco. Only points to two circumstances that was the center. Days before the Bicentennial which had a turnout in the three days of completion of about five million people, without a single incident, the journalist wrote when Cordoba was the remarkable concurrence: "Nobody should be surprised. The Bicentennial, instead of becoming a symbol of unity and national cohesion, will express ever since 1983 the fracture of a society poisoned by hatred ... ... And so, among other reasons in Cordoba and Buenos Aires hard to find flags hanging from the balconies of the houses. Telephone answering radios, talks of time in supermarkets and chain mails burner modest mood of anger and prompted many people to express their dissatisfaction with the Kirchner leaving bare the fronts of their houses ... That's what the citizens are extinguished patriotism ? Fanaticism. Unfortunately in this Argentina's economic boom, social fragmentation and political fragmentation, the sun is not poking out of 25. And the country is still that pain that we learn to mourn. " The other was one of the bloopers of Argentine journalism history: the blogger Luke Carrasco wrote in his blog a joke about his love a girl named Agustina in production of the "Le my word "dating a producer of the program leading Leuco. Ironically said if not separated, was holding a gun and kill them all. The mocking tone was evident but the Continental Radio journalist first, then in his television program stood before the cameras and reported in a dramatic tone that had been threatened with death by the blogger and that the complaint did not always come before Carrasco his machine gun. It seemed a theatrical scene of the magazine Barcelona. But if not ridiculous enough, some members of the "jury" repudiated the "threats" by Lucas.
Regarding Ernesto Sanz had statements so unfortunate that accompany the rest of his life. In relation to the child allowance, one of the few government measures praised by the opposition said: "Since implementing the Universal Placement Program per child, mark data that what was being spent on gambling and drugs has had a increase. "Silvano Santander and Ernesto Sanmartino, radicals like Sanz, must turn in their graves to have lived when there was news magazine. Certainly statements like: "They use the park to make asado" or "The flood zoo" would have made creditors at different times, to be chosen as the best politicians.
is a sneaky way of doing journalism, which defines the editorial profile as "pure journalism" without the ever-youthful rapture modesty of the veteran Jorge Fontevecchia cheeks.
In the last issue, December 24, made his usual coverage of the best and worst in different fields.
The so-called jury was composed in the last two years by Jorge Lanata, Margarita Stolbizer, Francisco de Narvaez, Joaquin Morales Sola, Victoria Donda, Magdalena Ruiz Guinazu, Fernando Braga Menéndez, Artemio López, Beatriz Sarlo, Marcos Aguinis, Graciela Romer Julio Barbaro, and Alfredo Leuco. They were joined in 2009: Elisa Carrio, Sergio Bergman, Alberto Cormillot, Juan Becerra, Nik, Julio Cobos, Gerardo Morales, Nina Pelozo, Nelson Castro, Mario Das Neves, Juan Ignacio de Mendiguren, John Carr, Mary O `Donnell Sergio Berensztein and Ricardo Rouvier. The latter were replaced in 2010 by Luis Majul, Paula Bertol, Ernesto Sanz, Pino Solanas, Sergio Massa, Rafael Bielsa, Graciela Ocaña, Roberto Pettinato, Luis D'Elias, Martin Sabbatella, Omar Bello, Daniel Sabsay, Guillermo Marco, Santiago Kovadloff and Daniel Hadad.
short: the jury as the spokesmen of pure journalism consists of 28 members, of which 13 was composed in the last two years. But the first alleged lie of pure journalism is that there is no jury in the sense that all its members meet and deliberate, and each in the presence of the other gives the reasons for their vote. It is a survey of 28 people by phone or email which is then tabulated the results of which no one is to verify. Call jury to a survey carried out so small, and without technical rules of statistics, is so misleading, false and biased as usual weekly titles. And all this is wrapped as pure journalism. The Editorial Perfil do one of his usual tricks is not surprising. What it is striking that many respectable people de la vida política e intelectual argentina se presten a este ardid para legitimar lo que ya está señalado desde antes del pretendido veredicto. Y que algunas de esas personas dignas concurran por segunda vez a que se los señale falsamente como jurados, cuando apenas han respondido a una encuesta, es una ingenuidad en la visión más permisiva y una lamentable complicidad en la mentira en la instancia menos favorable. Y cuyos resultados implican un intento de descalificación de personas en forma arbitraria.
Veamos cómo se expidió “el jurado” en los dos últimos años. El mejor político en el 2009 y 2010 fue el radical Ernesto Sanz. El peor fue Guillermo Moreno en el 2009 y en el año que concluye Elisa Carrio. The officer was Graciela Ocaña best last year and Nilda Garre in today. In the area journalists, the worst in the two years considered Orlando Barone was accompanied in 2010 by Victor Hugo Morales. The best was Joaquin Morales Sola in 2009 and Alfredo Leuco in 2010.
The striking that the newspaper company does not disclose what the parameters for nominations. This year on page 7 opens a precarious flimsy umbrella explanations under the heading "Voting controversy" in two of its paragraphs reads: "And the worst period forecast item disputes. This year Victor share this rating Hugo Morales and Orlando Barone, who had been elected in 2009. At that time, the panelist blasted 6,7,8 magazine. So it must be remembered that, as has been done for fifteen years, who chooses a jury of renowned personalities who, in secret, vote line by line. The result appears to count every vote ... .... This time the election of Victor Hugo as the worst period was also a surprise to this editor. It was from here that I ran for the Profile Award for Freedom of Expression 2009, he shared with Joaquin Morales Sola. This was done on the understanding that both, from their known paths personal, reflected two opposing positions and honest about the Media Law. We believe that the results of the 2010 Survey are crossed by the extreme polarization that led Kirchner. And to those who voted did not think Barone paths and Morales, but both took positions in relation to the government. "
Lost in flagrant contradictions, confused biased magazine survey (mentioned only once) with a jury. Even in the fall of the note reads: "A panel convened by NEWS chooses the winners and losers of the year" It is clear
confession, that professional values \u200b\u200bare not judged but positions politicians. This is an exercise in McCarthyism involved in the logo of pure journalism. It is worth pointing poignant and ironic writing, many of the original approaches Orlando Barone. In January, a group of journalists, outraged by the injustice that was perpetrated wantonly against the journalist and writer, published a declaration on page 12 under the title "In Defense of Orlando Barone."
Victor Hugo is the best English football reporter for the past five decades. Possessing a polished and precise language, a rare amenity, has entered with signal success in radio programs, radio news general interest, such as "The Radio" and "La Mañana", among others. What is being punished in the Uruguayan journalist, is its support for media law and multimedia historical confrontation with Clarin, which placed it on the same path that the government and its defense in general. It would be interesting to imagine if, when this is aligned with management of the field and when his opposition to the government
led him at first suspicious and look critically at the media law, voters in the poll would have nomination News worst journalist. Even if it means making a counterfactual history, it is easy to say no.
"Coincidentally" always the best traditional journalists are spokespersons establishment or some recent upstarts. In 1995, 1996 and 1997 he was elected Mariano Grondona, in this last year I shared with Morales Solá. In 1998 he was elected Magdalena Ruiz Guinazu. In 1999, Nelson Castro. From 2000 to 2006 he was elected Joaquín Morales Solá, which he shared with Nelson Castro in 2002 and 2005. In 2007 he won Jorge Lanata. In 2008 and 2009 again Morales Solá.
Finally, two final considerations regarding the selected items as best in journalism and politics: do not judge in this note the good qualities of fellow professionals Alfredo Leuco. Only points to two circumstances that was the center. Days before the Bicentennial which had a turnout in the three days of completion of about five million people, without a single incident, the journalist wrote when Cordoba was the remarkable concurrence: "Nobody should be surprised. The Bicentennial, instead of becoming a symbol of unity and national cohesion, will express ever since 1983 the fracture of a society poisoned by hatred ... ... And so, among other reasons in Cordoba and Buenos Aires hard to find flags hanging from the balconies of the houses. Telephone answering radios, talks of time in supermarkets and chain mails burner modest mood of anger and prompted many people to express their dissatisfaction with the Kirchner leaving bare the fronts of their houses ... That's what the citizens are extinguished patriotism ? Fanaticism. Unfortunately in this Argentina's economic boom, social fragmentation and political fragmentation, the sun is not poking out of 25. And the country is still that pain that we learn to mourn. " The other was one of the bloopers of Argentine journalism history: the blogger Luke Carrasco wrote in his blog a joke about his love a girl named Agustina in production of the "Le my word "dating a producer of the program leading Leuco. Ironically said if not separated, was holding a gun and kill them all. The mocking tone was evident but the Continental Radio journalist first, then in his television program stood before the cameras and reported in a dramatic tone that had been threatened with death by the blogger and that the complaint did not always come before Carrasco his machine gun. It seemed a theatrical scene of the magazine Barcelona. But if not ridiculous enough, some members of the "jury" repudiated the "threats" by Lucas.
Regarding Ernesto Sanz had statements so unfortunate that accompany the rest of his life. In relation to the child allowance, one of the few government measures praised by the opposition said: "Since implementing the Universal Placement Program per child, mark data that what was being spent on gambling and drugs has had a increase. "Silvano Santander and Ernesto Sanmartino, radicals like Sanz, must turn in their graves to have lived when there was news magazine. Certainly statements like: "They use the park to make asado" or "The flood zoo" would have made creditors at different times, to be chosen as the best politicians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment