Congratulations, Alfredo Leuco! The journal of copy Fontevecchia just name him the best journalist of the year. (God is great and let him enjoy life recognition, machine gun saved madly in love with Lucas Carrasco).
Carlos Barragán. (Registered Journal)
Shame and disgrace to you: Víctor Hugo Morales and Orlando Barone! That flawless publication stands out as the most the worst reporters. And on the butt note Paul serves award-unjustly without news-Kirchner denounced the sinister operative that puts standard for banks to corrupt journalists. Serve to prove your point with conviction quotes the following "propaganda," writes the journalist Maria O'Donnell in his book propaganda k (Planet, 2007) - does not pursue the truth and seeks to inform: its aim is to influence, deter, shape a thought. " delicious statement principles for the absurd.
This morning I listened to Mary O'Donnell set to 678 as official propaganda. I do not know how many times I heard the same from other journalists, but it bothers me more when it comes to smart people who keep honey. I guess it bothers me more for his intelligence that for me baby. Although descariño also received a bit mortified.
secret weapons say that 678 is propaganda desaprensión and shows great contempt for democratic diversity that fills their mouth as independent journalists. It is argued that there is a mass idiot who receives a message thoughts by geniuses devoted to inject malicious evil ideas on airheads. Propanga who speaks does not even suspect that 678 represents the thinking (or if you want: the same stupidity) of millions of citizens who are tired of listening to the old journalistic corporation repeating, if only by chance, the same ideas of the companies that sponsor. And then "influence, deter, shape thinking" I suppose it is the moral imperative of independent journalists with delivery Republican fools attempt to save from the clutches of official propaganda. I wonder what Mary O'donnell think when you read an editorial or Blank Kirschbaum. Think that this is not propaganda, of course not, and it is only journalists independent regardless defending the political interests of the company that pays their wages to make independent journalism. Obvious: as you can be independent trumpet you can not avoid defending a clarion call for love and immense gratitude to their selfless generosity leads you. Bestiary
independent journalist to receive money from private companies is the ne plus ultra of freedom of conscience. Regardless of how they make money, or where they take it, or what they use, and why give it to him, or how these companies operate or not ruin the planet or not, corrupt or not, fuck to the national economy or not, etc.. The important thing is that it is private. Although sometimes it may even be a laborers' union dedicated to working with grain that enslave them to generate profits that will be part of the pattern "unofficial" in the program independent journalist. Business
grain evading millions to the treasury will schedule the program independent journalist to have the freedom to criticize the government for how to use state resources as their sponsors cheat him. Occupations
rare
quote the quote: "propaganda," writes the journalist Maria O'Donnell in his book propaganda k (Planet, 2007) - does not pursue the truth and seeks to inform: it aims influence, deter, shape a thought. "pursue the truth and seek information are strenuous work for an independent journalist. Not so for me that only seeks to uncover lies and disturbing that misinform. And I think I can do this through the choice of government of having a program like 678 in the public channel. Because no independent journalist came to be still "seeking truth" there where the twine and the corporate interests that have driven the country's economy by controlling media.
"seeking truth" is by now a construction seudopoética as "love life" or "want a better world." The truth, at least so you can see in these times, is that there are two journalists who hate this government, and it supports a lot or moderate. What we can really talk when Victor Hugo's moral for the largest circulation magazine in the country the worst journalist in Argentina? (I leave out to Barone, not to say that he and I are a corporation). Such idiocy is a desperate statement. A brutal nakedness, but quite educational about the political and the media. Fontevecchia I finally told us something interesting.
Manual How to have as a journalist independent? Doing that Channel 7 and Channel 9 have their news programs Pablo Sirven, Van Der Kooy, Grondona, Lanata, Aguinis, Tenenbaum, O'donnell, Makhoul, Pagni, Ruiz Guinazu, Nelson Castro, etc ... And 678, hard to tame, TVR and down to see if the contract line at the thirteenth, Telefé or America. As this hardly happens, independent journalism will monopolize information and truth. But as the truth is good, the monopoly of truth will be the final remedy to so much wickedness kirhnerista.
The same goes for print media, that Angus is stop fucking around and see if the nation trumpet or hire him to write his notes. It will be difficult Anguita that work there, but it will be good for the seekers of truth that Angus no longer have much space for their ideas "too political", ma'am.
Nicaragua, so violently sweet
(the title has nothing to do with anything, but it grabbed me I do not want to lose Cortázar used)
The hypocrisy of independent journalist argues that there is freedom in the private media. He denies knowing that each half began as a political expression. (If to trumpet developmentalist era) And refuses, perhaps "to ignorendas" that all journalism is an ideological expression. And the most evil of speech is proposed as a paradigm of his alleged apolitical pursuit of truth that such activity must be sponsored by private companies. The funny thing is that 678 has a lot of advertising of this kind, and yet for the independent journalist still being a damn dirty propaganda. There
case. Only independent journalist can earn money and remain a pure soul in the midst of such ruling.
For now I'll have to keep telling myself fakir what I think without being accused of running.
0 comments:
Post a Comment